These are the two first masks I did for the new body of work. Sculpture is a fairly new element to my practice, which allows me to create my own figures of 'otherness.' This came as a natural progression to the extensive use of animal symbolism in Down a Rabbit Hole. Instead of seeking out already made objects and shaping my work around it, I took matter into my own hands.
What I enjoy most about making things, whatever it may be, is the challenge of working out how to transform something that exists in fantasy into something that exists in reality. The transformation of materials, usually various types of card board and paper, folded, layered and transformed. A process that in itself carries some significant elements of unknown.
Not all the masks will make it into images for this work. I feel that they play perhaps an even bigger part as ways to continue the narrative and conversation outside the images. As three dimensional objects they occupy our space in a different way to the photograph. They have location and presence. They're the invisible made visible. They reunite the world of imagination with the physical world. ( I should add that they do so in a similar manner to the photograph, but my point here is how they occupy our space differently than the two dimensional object.)
Some masks are born from specific research, influences and/or plans. The birds came from a continued fascination with Hitchcock's The Birds and for what happens when natural things become unnatural. Birds occur frequently in films as bad omens, usually inserted into a shot before something bad happens, like in Mad Max where a bird appears just before a couple is attacked by barbaric outlaws, and again as Max’s wife runs for her life (through the symbolic woods). But in Hitchcock’s film they are the evil force that has come to prey upon us. The scary thing about these birds is that their actions remain unexplained throughout the film and leaves questions of why unanswered. The film leaves its narrative unresolved with an open ending.The resulting feeling of unease and fear is heightened because these animals share our everyday environment and have become natural monsters. They aren’t fantasy birdlike hybrids; they are seagulls, sparrows, crows and other familiar species.
The animals in my own imagery are often ambiguous, hybrid creatures. They fall in to mainly two categories: characters that are largely human, but are given various animal characteristics though props, and creature sculptures. They represent my personal reflections on a fear of the unknown in figures of the Other. I explore the contrast between the natural and the fabricated on several levels; one is by constructing my own birds and animal masks based largely on fantasy, or through the occasional use of taxidermy.
The clown was born out somewhat similar reasons, but is made with a specific yet-to-be-shot image in mind. Which hopefully will (must) happen in a week or two.
Clowns fit the distinction of a type of human/monster hybrid. They are monstrous in their bizarre appearance through a combination of stylised make-up, costume and props, and can evoke all sorts of frightening implications. Though they are characters usually associated with humour, they are also grotesque beings. Disproportionate with exaggerated features and abnormal abilities to withstand dangerous physical challenges often associated with slapstick violence, makes us wary of the clown’s duality and otherness because of the unknown it represents.
Noel Carroll writes on the link between horror and humour in films like Killer Klowns from Outer Space and Beetlejuice, examples of what he calls horror-comedies:
“[...] the recognition that horror is intimately and essentially bound up with the violation, problematization, and transgression of our categories, norms, and concepts puts us in a particularly strategic position from which explore the relation of horror to humour, because humour- is also necessarily linked to the problematization, violation, and transgression of standing categories, norms and concepts.”*
The clown is a good example of this duality. By changing certain features or behaviour it can be both a thing of comedy and of horror, like the clowns in Killer Klowns... are a perfect example of.
This is the first hand cast I made. I broke three of its fingers. Mostly because I was so damn eager to try them out. (Note to self: waiting for plaster to dry completely is a good idea.) I broke the thumb trying to get a latex mould off. Little did I know that, 1: the latex was not dry after 10 hours. 2: the plaster was not dry, which didn't help the latex. 3- my excitement got the better of me. Again. Fair enough.
Not the pose or height I'm after, but for a first try, I was pretty amazed by the details. Fingerprints, pores, everything. Alginate rules. I've got a shipment in the mail and am currently looking for a suitable container to start (again). I've put my hand in pretty much everything around the house today still with no luck. Tomorrow is another day.
*Carroll, N. (1999) ‘Horror and Humor’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Vol. 57, No.2
5 comments:
do not photographs have 'location and presence'...?
Note to self: time to re-run on Hitchcock.....but NOT until end of year...damn essay!!
yes, they do, but not in the same way as a sculpture has. They occupy our space in different ways. Or so I think anyway.
What's the essay on?
they do occupy space, in a very diffferent way, i agree - they stick out i suppose..[heh heh]...and photos? they stand out -well yours do anyhooo - love your work! my essay is on the fragmented body - do you have any artists or theorists you can recommend?
p.s yout blog is really great....still getting through it...ta. oh and is your website a cheap prosses? can i get one too??
Thank you [very humbly] very much!
My website is a mobile me mac-thing made with iweb. I don't think it costs too much. I thankfully have an older brother who kindly pays for it.
When you say fragmented body I immediately think of Lucas Samaras. He does some pretty wild things, I'm a fan of his polaroid work in particular. Anyway, you should check him out. Have you looked at Linda Nochlin's The Body in Pieces: The Fragment as a Metaphor of Modernity?
I've read it, but to be honest the english was way over my head. There was some good stuff as well, but some of those words in there... jeez.. even Shane couldn't explain it.
could composite bodies be considered as fragmented? Well, I guess they are seeing how they're made up of fragments... Norwegian photographer Simen Johan has this body of work 'And nothing was to be trusted' where all the kids are composites. It's brilliantly freaky.
Post a Comment